Showing posts with label Human Rights Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Rights Act. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 March 2013

Newell News-round Up, week 1

The end of the week and indeed the month and the beginning of what I hope is a regular weekly round up of some stories from across the various news platforms.

March 25th - March 31st 2013.

On the human rights front we have had the Western media blackout of the Guantanamo Bay hunger strike which has been running for 6 weeks and the more pressing issue of Theresa May and her abuse of the human rights act taking centre stage in the UK. Since the supreme cock up in 2012 where the Home Secretary got her dates mixed up, May has lead a one woman campaign to get the act torn up for toilet paper and is harnessing the religious divide created by the war of terror, sorry war on terror, to capitalise on people's fears. The latest defeat of the government in the courts is sure to lead to another onslaught on the human rights act and the European Court of Human Rights. Just remember that something that is there to benefit the many should not be unilaterally undone to satisfy the needs of the few, or be justified by way of the actions of a few. And if you truly believe it has anything to do with giving prisoners in the UK the vote, then you need to sit yourself down and take a good look around at what is going on.

The U.S. President Barack Obama has been up to his old tricks again, not content with signing away one disgraceful act during the small hours of the night whilst everyone was out partying (NDAA Act New Years Eve 2012 which effectively tore up the the American Constitution) he just signed the Monsanto security bill, which was written in part by the very billion-dollar company that stands to benefit the most from it, Monsanto. Whether or not he has expressed concerns as explicit as the ones for NDAA where he said: "The fact I support this act as a whole does not mean I agree with everything inside it. I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists." The full statement from that car wreck piece of legislation can be found here.

Off the back of these two pieces of horrendous American legislation we have had the largest attack on the Internet by what will undoubtedly be called 'cyber terrorists', this week as a row between a spam fighting group and a hosting firm spilled over. I did not even notice to be honest and neither did many others as we were supposed to experience a severe slowing of the global network but, as the Guardian highlighted, major companies experienced nothing unusual and it makes me wonder whether or not this was a publicity stunt or someone dipping their toe into the water for something at a later date.

I cannot finish without a comment on Cyprus. As of today depositors have been told that they face losing up to 60% of their savings which is nothing short of robbery. If the Cypriots went into a bank and held a cashier at gun point and asked for 60% there would be some serious prison time for anyone involved, if they did not get shot by trigger happy policia on the way out. The government can shut the banks for several days and block any transfers fearing a run on the bank and then slap police outside when they do reopen to keep order and that is O.K. There is something seriously wrong with this world if we think that this is acceptable behaviour and if anyone thinks that this would not happen anywhere else in Europe, including the UK, then again I would suggest you sit down and take a good look around at what is going on. The debt in Cyprus is nothing compared to that of Greece, Ireland, Italy Spain and even the UK so if you do not think that it was again another toe in the water, what can we get away with, exercise then think again.

The great bank robbery 


Thursday, 25 October 2012

Workers rights continue to get slashed by the Tory Reapers

Workers rights are a small part of the much wider Human Rights (Article 23 of the U.D.) but are being literally torn up by the government.

Just recently (and without public consultation) the government amended the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill (ERRB) at the last minute, at Report Stage, in the House of Commons which has resulted in the removal of basic rights for injured workers. The new clause, (61 of the ERRB) will mean that if injured due to a breach of an employers statutory duty within the Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA), they will be unable to enforce that breach in a court of law.

At present if an employer fails to operate within the regulations of the HSWA and an individual is injured as a result of negligence and/or breach of statutory duty, a claim can be brought against the employer. If the new proposed clause were to remain it would mean that an employer would no longer be liable in the civil courts for the criminal offence of a breach of the HSWA.

This will mean an employee will now have to prove in court that the employer was negligent rather than rely on the breach of the regulations themselves.

Meanwhile the Labour Party have challenged the amendment but after the vote on October 17th in the House of Commons, the challenge failed and so the bill, as amended, now sits with the other out of touch bunch at the House of Lords.

The government are justifying their lack of public consultation or impact assessment on a recent review of health and safety by Professor Ragnar Löfstedt. Professor Löfstedt recommended the abolishment of the strict liability provisions within the HSWA (where they do not have a defence of reasonable practicability) or that civil liability should be removed. Our government seems to be having it's cake and eating it by trying to do both.

The amendment is in regard to Section 47 of the HSWA which contains the assumption that regulations made under all aspects of health and safety regulations, carry civil liability for any breaches, unless otherwise expressly excluded. The government's amendment will effectively reverse that assumption and mean that no H&S regulation, under the HSWA or other, would impose civil liability, unless express provision was made for them to do so.

With the regulations not having any express provision and no proposal to amend them there will be no civil enforcement allowing the government to then create general defences that could apply to all H&S regulations and not have to insert that defence into every set. Clever.
This therefore has the potential to provide the power to impose a general defence of 'reasonable practicality'.

BIS minister Matthew Hancock said in the debate:

“We are ensuring…that there is a test of reasonableness for the actions of employers, so that those who have taken all reasonable precautions cannot be prosecuted for a technical breach.
“The definition of reasonableness will come from the common-law interpretation, and the concept is already well regarded and specified in law.”

The new section 47 will not have this affect, it will however allow the government to make changes such as this through further regulations.

What we are seeing now is another example of the government driving a train through the a century of legislation fought for by the people before us. 

The case of Groves v Lord Wimborne, 1898 and Strict liability was found when the Court ruled that "the defence of common employment is not applicable in a case where injury has been caused to a servant by the breach of an absolute duty imposed by statute upon his master for his protection."

Now without civil liability any injured person will have to prove that there has been a breach of regulations.

The future is uncertain for us all, we face the only enforcement being through that of the underfunded and understated Health and Safety Executive

The Tories and other right wing agenda setters such as The Daily Mail like to talk of how Labour are hostage to the 'Union Barons', yet it is the Tory led coalition government that is two-stepping along with the insurance industry, who coincidentally are a huge donor to the Conservative Party. Whilst Labour are not innocent in all this, the hypocrisy of the Tory statements regarding funding are not lost on us. 
The banking scandals that seem to keep erupting and being ignored by the larger public and the government in general are made more interesting with the revelation that the Conservative Party has tenuous links to the City's banks, which might go some way to explaining why it is us in the working class, and not them, that are paying for this financial crises. 

So much for being in this together.

The Conservative government so far have;
  • Forced through the Jackson reforms;
  • Removed most legal aid;
  • it is seeking to reduce the amount an injury victim can recover in costs to win a case even if the court rules those costs were necessary to win.
  • They want to stop injured people with cases under £5,000 in value getting the cost of the lawyer representing them; and
  • They are seeking to put all cases under £25,000 in value through an automated system that isn’t even working for road accident cases.
All these latest reforms will serve to do are penalise the vulnerable people in our society, making it harder to access justice for injuries caused through no fault of their own.

These revelations come against the backdrop of workers facing dismissal through capability without the safe guards in place to protect them from uncaring and impatient employers and the increase in pension age.

These are some dark times, maybe the view of dark satanic mills portrayed in Danny Boyle's Olympic opening ceremony are not so far off the mark after all.

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

100 Not Out, There are No Problems but Human Problems.



"The world is a dangerous place to live in not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it" Albert Einstein. 
This is the quote that starts the mission statement of the EDL web page. For those of you unfamiliar with the EDL they are the self proclaimed English Defence League, established in 2009 following the verbal abuse of soldiers returning to the UK from Afghanistan during a parade in Luton. Some ugly scenes occurred and the rest as they say is history.

Describing themselves as a human rights organisation, they use the term at least 5 times throughout their mission statement, but at no point do they refer to what articles they claim they are defending exactly. 

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was ratified on December 10th 1948, they are a right for every man woman and child on the planet, yet the very fact that they have to exist at all is damning indictment of the so called civilisation we live in. I imagine very few people have actually read through the declarations, so to see the EDL page refer to their enforcement and support of human rights was surprising to say the least. The mission statement refers to supporting the right to free speech (when talking about the right to speak against so called radical Islam) the right for Muslim's to practice their religion in a more tolerant way than the 'original 7th century form' (with regard to supposed sharia-law being invoked in Britain) yet there are no direct references to the articles they claim to be in support of; which leads me to think that they have either heard of human rights and not actually read or understood them, or they just do not know them.

For the record the right to freedom of speech and opinion is covered by Article 19 and states;
 "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." 
Whilst the freedom to practice religion is covered by Article 18 which states; 
"Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance."

That the people that created the EDL claim to be in support of these principles is a betrayal of the people that live and die by them on a daily basis as our own governments violate them everyday and, by the EDL's very own actions, they violate some of the most basic principles. 
The very first article states; 
Article 1 of the UD
"All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."

As you browse through the website is clear to see that the EDL do not follow even the first article let alone support or defend any of the others they claim.

It would be easy now to sit here and go into a torrent of abuse at the EDL, its self appointed leader Steven Lennon, and his misguided followers as many others may have but the simple matter is this; like you or I they are just another group of humans, albeit damaged in some way like many of us are, and like the rest of us are products of their environment. No one is born 'racist' as society describes it, no one is born with hatred or intolerance. These are learned behaviours from their experiences and can be changed. Despite what you may have been told there is no evil or racist gene. 
As someone who in their younger years suffered violence from people both sides of the battle ground now drawn up by the EDL, I know how easy it is to be consumed with anger, mistrust and the feeling of isolation. Those experiences shape who you are, you must learn from them and I can say that I did, at a time where I could have chosen a different path to the one I am on now. It is because of these specific experiences I refuse to be drawn in to the mudslinging contest and aggressive nature of claim and counter claim of the EDL and their various opposition.

Hating the EDL will not make them go away, nor will it solve the issue of their existence or any extremist groups like them.

Where the efforts should be made is in highlighting our similarities, the facts that we have more in common with each other than the billionaire war criminals perpetually trying to drive a wedge between us. As long as we continue to be at each others throats the real threat to our liberties go unnoticed and unchallenged. We are all subject to the subtle and not so subtle efforts of the mainstream media to terrorise us in to hating each other and remain fearful. Much of this fear and mistrust is born of ignorance, and that is not to say this is intentional or otherwise, as explained earlier we are all products of our environment. If Steven Lennon had been adopted at birth and raised by a Muslim family he may well have ended up on the side of the very people he claims to have issue with. I mentioned earlier that there is no 'racist' gene, all our genes are responsible for are things such as our eye colour, features etc and as Jacque Fresco once said "It may give you a better brain than some, with better neural pathways etc, but if you are raised in a fascist state it will just mean you become a fascist quicker." 

As with all groups, there are varying degrees of sympathy towards the EDL. Newspapers such as The Daily Mail promote views in line with some of their rhetoric, which people who consider themselves to be 'middle class' take on board without question. This is again the reason why labelling them 'racist' or 'Nazi thugs' will not solve the problems created by the media, whose sole purpose it seems is to keep a perpetual state of fear and misunderstanding, with buzz words such as grooming, extremism and terror never too far from an article. It must also be considered that alongside the perpetual bombardment from the media, some of these sympathetic people or misguided followers of the EDL, may have had negative experiences with small sections from within communities. This will only serve to reinforce those messages and is why I say we must try to engage in positive experiences with those people. By being hateful towards them all we do is serve to reinforce the propaganda and lies that they are bombarded with over and over again on the social conditioning box.

To combat this we must start by educating the young who may be in an environment where certain rhetoric is all they hear, for instance the now infamous woman on the tram, Emma West, is an example of such and environment. We need to start reprogramming our language and remove the notion that people of different colour skin are of different races, reinforcing the message that we are one human species and family. We also need to address the lies in the media that constantly blame immigration for the downturn of the economy, rather than the bankers and the billions of pounds that the tax payer bailed them out with, and highlight the fact that technology is playing an increasing part of unemployment. We need to start pointing the finger in the right direction and I do not mean the far right, I mean at the government and their paymasters. 
There are people out there challenging the status quo, Morgan Freeman, Jacque Fresco and Ken O'Keefe to name a well known few, will you add your name to this list?


We must start to take responsibility for the world we have helped to create and help to shape it for the better by creating positive experiences for the people we interact with and not leave it someone else. My friend recently said to me that we often talk about creating a better world for our children, but never creating better children for our world. This is our challenge and we must face it.





Thursday, 5 January 2012

Social Conditioning Box

Television, the source of information for us all for so long, has led to a culture of indoctrination unprecedented at any time in our history. The ability for marketing firms, employed by government, to promote a party line or drum up support through adverts, entertainment shows and news programs for unjust wars and the acceptance of the removal of our human rights is quite frankly disturbing.

Between David Cameron, Barack Obama and their guide dogs Theresa May and Hilary Clinton, human rights have taken a severe shake up. The signing of the recent National Defence Authorisation Act 2012 by Barack Obama (on New Years eve whilst everyone else was out getting drunk) was the latest in a line of acts signed by our so called leaders that have watered down our liberty. These acts include the UK's Terrorism Prevention and Investigatory Measures (TPims) and of course the USA Patriot Act 2001.

Having read through them they make for unsettling reading, which is more than can be said for congress or parliament who probably read the cover and proceeded to nod it through like a CFA meeting.

Never at any time has it been more important to ask more questions. Unfortunately for us all, this has not been the case.

The shame of it all is that the majority passively accept what they are told because we are all too easily distracted. Entertainment shows, so called 'reality' shows and soap operas dominate the airwaves and if they do not get you here then they immerse you in sport 24/7. They underpin this 360˚ distraction television by constantly bombarding us with news streams depicting images of terror designed to keep us in a constant state of fear. Of course once they have sown the seed of fear and terror they then proceed to show us 'heroic' images of our soldiers after being half blown to kingdom come and encourage us all to pay for their rehabilitation and after care.
The government sent them to die, the government should then honour their duty to care for them once they have been injured or maimed and provide for their families if they do not make it home.

There is a reason why I call it the social conditioning box.

Through the power of the media they demonise immigrants and asylum seekers (formerly known as refugees) blaming them for unemployment, increases in crime and a stuttering economy, whilst brushing under the carpet the true reasons for this-the disproportionate standard of living between those that have and those that do not. You cannot have continuous growth in a system that is good for a few and terrible for the rest. It is designed to fail.
The danger lies in the fact that the daily lies they sell us encourage us to ask for the sanctions they  impose on our liberties just because we did not truly understand what is was we were asking for.


The needs of the many out way the needs of the few and until this is understood by all we will fail to achieve any kind of security, safety or peace, today or tomorrow. Homeland security extends beyond the falsely created borders we have created for ourselves for the entire planet is our home.
To this end we must stop letting the ruling class divide us through language, racism does not exist other than for government to sell wars and hatred to us. We are one human race.
Until this dawning comes to us all we shall all have to make do with the signing away of our liberties and watch them die out to the sound of thunderous applause.


Obama NDAA 2012
UK Pre-crime department
Fascism rises again

Saturday, 31 December 2011

Class Wars 2011, The Workers Strike BACK!

This year has been the year of the protester. Time magazine saw fit to make the protester its coveted 'person of the year', of course Hitler has also featured here before so let us not jump for joy too soon.

From the first signs of revolt in Tunisia a year ago, yes it all began back then in Tunisia (the dawn of the Arab spring) through to the horrific scenes at one breakfast time of Gaddafi being brutalised and executed in the streets by rebels in October this year, the protester has taken the worlds media by storm.
Closer to home there has been the national day of action on November 30th, an occupy movement in London, with the movement taking hold in over 900 cities world-wide as people rally against a system unjust. A system that is good for a few (and if truth be told the majority really of the self named 99%) but enslaves the rest, the rest being left without access to clean drinking water, shelter and food. Something that is a basic human right for all.


It seems we are not amused.


So whilst the rich get richer, the not so rich complain about not having enough fiat currency for the latest iPhone or Nike Air Jordan athletic trainers, the poor get busy dying.  Some of us have decided to make a stand and ask more questions.
Whilst some of the humans try to spread the message and ask the questions the rest of the planet has not thought of yet, the likes of David Cameron and Barack Obama, with their guide dogs Hilary Clinton and Theresa May, they continue to preach to people outside of their club about human rights and the right to free speech. Syria, Iran and China are regularly in their sights, and maybe rightly so,  however they themselves continue to belittle, beat, imprison and silence their own people with the very essence of fascism that they claim to be liberating the rest of the world from.
Quick to jump on the Arab spring bandwagon because they think they might be in for a cheap barrel of oil but even quicker to crack down on a slave revolt on their own doorstep as people begin to see that the game is up, after all who will flip their burgers, switch on the petrol pumps or tooth fairy forbid make their Calvin Klein's?

As Ghandi put it Mr Cameron and Mr Obama "be the change you want to see"


In light of all this Dejavusion Productions and Lucas Media have collaborated again to bring you a trailer for an upcoming short movie inspired by the Star Wars movies. Class Wars trailer


Nike Air Jordan scenes. You couldn't make it up.
Theresa May's Human Rights Rant. Shocking